USPTO serial 74025387
SHUR-BRITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 8, 1992
- Examiner
- RUBEL, ELLEN A.
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with SHUR-BRITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dayton, OH, US
VANDALIA, OH, US
Dayton, OH, US
Dayton, OH, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristin H. Hardy
Kristin H. Hardy TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLP115 Madison Street, Suite 700DAYTON, OH 45402United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | abrasive products; namely, general duty abrasive wheels; unified abrasive wheels; deburring abrasive wheels; deburring unified abrasive wheels, duplex abrasive wheels; convolute abrasive wheels; satin flap abrasive wheels; clean and finish abrasive wheels; satin abrasive discs; surface conditioning abrasive discs; and abrasive hand pads, sheets and rolls, at least the abrasive portion of each fabricated of non-woven nylon | ACTIVE | Dec 13, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Superior Abrasives, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SUPERIOR ABRASIVES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Superior Abrasives, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Superior Abrasives, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named SHUR-BRITE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | RNL3 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 21, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 21, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 17, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 18, 2012 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 5, 2002 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 1997 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 24, 1997 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 16, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 10, 1992 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 7, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 14, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 12, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 8, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 2, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |