USPTO serial 74036017
COBI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDONALD, MARY KAY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COBI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | services consisting of the transmission or systematization of written communications and the distribution of samples | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | services in connection with the education of people and children in international class 41 | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | retail or wholesale business involved in the selling of souvenirs, key chains, tee-shirts, and like novelties in international class 42 | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 1992 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 1991 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Nov 1, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 1991 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 19, 1990 | DRHI | DIVISIONAL REQUEST HELD INFORMAL | — |
| Oct 26, 1990 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 1990 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |