USPTO serial 74037452
IRON POWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HINES, CARYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IRON POWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-8206 Bruckmuehl, DE
D-8206 Bruckmuehl, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Toren
KATRIN LEWERTOFF SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP787 7TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | iron-containing food supplement | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 10, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 13, 1992 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1992 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 13, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 16, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |