Drawing for SMACKS

USPTO serial 74039178

SMACKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LEE, SUSAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SMACKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard S. McMillin

RICHARD S MCMILLIN, PC MARKS & CLARE11605 MIRACLE HILLS DRSTE 300AM STOMAHA, NE 68154

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037service station servicesABANDONEDAug 21, 1988
042convenience store servicesABANDONEDAug 21, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 18, 1993OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Dec 3, 1992ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Dec 3, 1992OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Sep 28, 1992OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Sep 30, 1991OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Apr 23, 1991PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 22, 1991NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 11, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 3, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 18, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 16, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 23, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance