USPTO serial 74045212
KOMPERDELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KOMPERDELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert Dubno
5676 RIVERDALE AVENEW YORK, NY 10471-0900UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing for gymnastics and sports, namely, shorts, gym shorts, cycling shorts, athletic shirts, tee shirts, body suits, leotards, tights, sweat shirts, sweat pants, ski pants, ski jackets, jogging suits, sweat suits, sneakers, running shoes, aerobic shoes, hats, caps, sun visors, headbands, wristbands, gloves, mittens, ski masks | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | games, namely, action type board games, action type target ring games; articles for gymnastics and sports, namely, skis, ski poles, ski disks, ski pole handles, gymnastics articles, namely, parallel bars, uneven bars, gymnastic horse, gymnastic rings, balance beams, basketballs, footballs, soccerballs, baseballs, bats, baseball mitts, hockey sticks, hockey pucks, tennis rackets and nets, table tennis paddles and nets, ice skates, ski boots | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |