USPTO serial 74056944
NEUROGUARD VMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEUROGUARD VMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Warren M. Becker
WARREN M BECKER FLIESLER, DUBB, MEYER & LOVEJOYFOUR EMBARCADERO CTRSTE 400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | transcranial doppler blood flow measuring apparatus consisting primarily of a doppler monitoring probe, electronics, namely a microcomputer for processing the output of the probe, a display and an alarm which provides output to a user | ABANDONED | May 25, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 25, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1994 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 1994 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1993 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 1993 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1993 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 1993 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1992 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 1992 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 21, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 19, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 31, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |