USPTO serial 74061900
MULTIPHOBES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HINES, CARYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MULTIPHOBES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation
Wilmington, DE
Other trademarks owned by Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation
Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation
Wilmington, DE
Other trademarks owned by Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Margaret Ranft Day
MARGARET RANFT DAY LOCATION E2250UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION39 OLD RIDGEBURY RDDANBURY, CT 06817-0001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemical stabilizers and reactive surfactants for use in the coatings, adhesives and sealants industries | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named MULTIPHOBES
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 1992 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 9, 1992 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Apr 7, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 14, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 13, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 22, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |