USPTO serial 74066466
ROXELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1926813Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 1995
- Examiner
- COLE RICHARD G
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ROXELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Maldegem, BE
ROXELL, BESLOTEN VENNOOTSCHAP MET BEPERKE AANSPRAKELIJKHEID
MALDEGEM, BE
Other trademarks owned by ROXELL, BESLOTEN VENNOOTSCHAP MET BEPERKE AANSPRAKELIJKHEID
Maldegem, BE
Maldegem, BE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID B. KIRSCHSTEIN,
DAVID B KIRSCHSTEIN KIRSCHSTEIN, OTTINGER, ISRAEL, ET AL.489 FIFTH AVE17TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017-6105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metallic [grain and] animal feed storage bins; [metallic cages and egg collectors for poultry] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | agricultural implements and machines; namely, mechanical feeding and watering units for poultry [and livestock;] mechanical [grain and] animal feed storage bins; animal feed conveyors and dispensers including tubing and conduits all sold as a unit; [mechanical cages and egg collectors; incubators for eggs] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | automated [ventilators], waterers, [heaters, cleaners and sanitizers for poultry and livestock houses and barns;] mechanical drinkers for poultry [and livestock] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Roxell N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by ROXELL, BESLOTEN VENNOOTSCHAP MET BEPERKE AANSPRAKELIJKHEID
- Other trademarks owned by Roxell N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Roxell N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named ROXELL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | RDEN | NOTE OF REPLACEMENT DENIED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | ENOR | TEAS NOTE OF REPLACEMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2006 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 2, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 1995 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 26, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 26, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 19, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 16, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 8, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 8, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 1992 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |