USPTO serial 74075591
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ABACUS ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS INC.
EDMONTON, ALBERTA, CA
EDMONTON, ALBERTA, CA
ABACUS ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS INC.
EDMONTON, ALBERTA, CA
Edmonton, Alberta, CA
ABACUS ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS INC.
EDMONTON, ALBERTA, CA
SILVER MOUNTAIN SOFTWARE (ONTARIO) INC.
NEWMARKET, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by SILVER MOUNTAIN SOFTWARE (ONTARIO) INC.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JONATHAN I FEIL
JONATHAN I FEIL SIMBURG KETTER SHEPPARD & PURDY999 3RD AVE STE 2525SEATTLE, WA 98104-4089UNITED STATESCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 3, 1998 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 3, 1998 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 2, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 10, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 11, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |