USPTO serial 74078512
DESIGNATED DRIVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DESIGNATED DRIVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. Hughes
ROBERT B HUGHES HUGHES & MULTER, PS1720 IOWA STBELLINGHAM, WA 98226UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | novelty items including an object simulating a drinking container but without a containing area for a beverage | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 11, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 11, 1995 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |