USPTO serial 74080592
HDC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HDC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HDC Communications Group, Inc.
Vancourver, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James F. McKeown
JAMES F MCKEOWN EVENSON, WANDS, EDWARDS, ET ALSTE 7001200 G ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | television broadcasting services by satellite | ABANDONED | — |
| 040 | motion picture and video tape editing services | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | motion picture film and videotape production and distribution services, rental services in the field of high definition television equipment | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | consulting services in the field of videotape and motion picture production, leasing access time to a computer database in the field of motion picture, video and television production resources | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HDC Communications Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HDC
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |