Drawing for SALON SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 74085419

SALON SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HINES, CARYN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SALON SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LYNDA E. ROESCH

LYNDA E ROESCH DINSMORE & SHOHL1900 CHEMED CTR255 E FIFTH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003nail care preparations; namely, nail polish, acrylic strengthener, nail hardener, top coat, base coat, quick dry, nail growth treatment fluid, nail cuticle and hand cream and cuticle pumice creamABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 1995OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
May 31, 1995OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Dec 19, 1994ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Dec 19, 1994OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Dec 16, 1994OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
May 5, 1992OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Feb 19, 1992OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Dec 10, 1991PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 8, 1991NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 19, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 13, 1991CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Jan 11, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance