USPTO serial 74092648
FORCE 10
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1793417Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 21, 1993
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FORCE 10?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Paris, FR
Paris, FR
Paris, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur Schwartz
ARTHUR SCHWARTZ FOLEY & LARDNERP O BOX 299ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-0299UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2000 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 15, 2000 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 21, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 3, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 11, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 10, 1993 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 9, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |