USPTO serial 74097361
TISSERAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLUE, RACHEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TISSERAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tisserand Aromatherapy Limited
Hove East Sussex BN3 2BD, GB
Tisserand Aromatherapy Limited
Hove East Sussex BN3 2BD, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Doris Maroko
DORIS MAROKO WILLIAN BRINKS OLDS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services; namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences, correspondence courses and workshops in the fields of holistic therapy and health care, aromatherapy, massage therapy, anatomy, physiology, clinical medicine and nursing; and publication of books, magazines, wall charts and journals relating to the fields of holistic therapy, health care, aromatherapy, massage therapy, anatomy, physiology, clinical medicine and nursing | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 24, 1994 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 1994 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1994 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 4, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1993 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 18, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 18, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |