Drawing for ULTRA-CLEAR

USPTO serial 74098479

ULTRA-CLEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTRA-CLEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Myron Cohen, Esq.

MYRON COHEN ESQ COHEN, PONTANI & LIEBERMAN551 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10176UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002acrylic urethane varnish type coatingABANDONEDAug 20, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 1993ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Dec 21, 1993EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 21, 1993EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
May 14, 1993CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Dec 23, 1992EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Sep 18, 1992REINREINSTATED
Jul 1, 1992ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 14, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 19, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance