USPTO serial 74099012
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
I. Edward Marquette
I EDWARD MARQUETTE SPENCER FANE BRITT & BROWNE1400 COMMERCE BANK BLDG1000 WALNUT STKANSAS CITY, MO 64106-2140| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machines, namely hydraulic pumps, hydraulic motors, bent-axis variable displacement motors, hydrostatic transmissions, hydraulic transmissions comprising hydraulic pump and a hydraulic motor, hydraulic and mechanical controls therefor, gear drives, gear pumps, fan drives, and gear boxes for use with hydraulic and hydrostatic transmissions and parts therefor | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | electrical and electronic controls comprising electrohydraulic transducers and electrical sensors, and parts thereof, all of the foregoing being for the control of hydraulic transmissions, hydraulic power systems for stationary use and motor vehicles and their working implements, and microprocessor based controllers and diagnostic systems | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |