USPTO serial 74100113
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MIAMI TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
MIAMI TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INCSTE 208TH1790 W 49TH STHIALEAH, FL 33012CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 28, 1992 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 9, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 16, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 9, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |