Drawing for ARTIFEX

USPTO serial 74101420

ARTIFEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GREER, CYNTHIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARTIFEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. FRANKLIN ROTHWELL

G FRANKLIN ROTHWELL ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST, ET ALSTE 701 E555 THIRTEENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009facsimile machines, blank magnetic data carriers, blank compact discs; automatic vending machines and parts therefor; cash registers; calculating machines and data processors; fire extingushing aparatusABANDONED—
038communications services; namely, electronic transmission of message and dataABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 1993ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 19, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 1993CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 23, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 11, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 4, 1992CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 2, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 4, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance