USPTO serial 74102817
HARRY RAMSDEN'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HARRY RAMSDEN'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart L. Gitler
STEWART L GITLER HOFFMAN, WASSON & GITLER2361 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYSTE 522ARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | meat, fish, poultry and game; mollusca and crustacea; prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, poultry and/or seafood; preserved, dried and cooked vegetables; potato chips and french fried potatoes and fish cakes | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | fish products; namely, fish pie and meat pies | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | restaurant services, take out restaurant services and catering services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HARRY RAMSDEN'S (RESTAURANT) LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by HARRY RAMSDEN'S (RESTAURANT) LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HARRY RAMSDEN'S
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 12, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 24, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 18, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |