USPTO serial 74103533
AIRTITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AIRTITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Nechells, Birmingham, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George P. McAndrews
HERBERT D HART III MCANDREWS, HELD & MALLOY, LTDNORTHWESTERN ATRIUM CTR 34TH FL500 W MADISON STCHICAGO, IL 60661Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | compositions for producting cementitious foams in the mining industry; namely, for achieving an impervious coating on surfaces located within a mine | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 1996 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 5, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1991 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |