USPTO serial 74108844
HYDRAFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHULMAN, LORI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HYDRAFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Harrison
MARK HARRISON SPENCER & FRANK1111 NINETEENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | tubes and conduits made of said tubes, laminated and corrugated hoses not including automobile radiator hoses, bellows, oval bellows, thermal expansion bodies, thermal, vibration, volume and pressure compensators, tube and joint connectors, hose joints, decoupling elements, bellows decoupling elements; all of the above goods are made of metal; sliprings for sealing coupler joints | ABANDONED | — |
| 012 | land vehicles parts; namely, steering shaft bellows, exhaust gas compensators, vibration dampers, shock absorbers, impact absorbers, passenger/driver knee protection elements, exhaust gas probes, gas and oil coolers, engine heat exchangers; sound absorbing exhaust pipes | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | procurement services for data processing programs | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | repair and maintenance of motor vehicle and motor parts; leasing of machines, tools and devices for the production of tubes, hoses, and bellows; construction planning and consulting services | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | engineering services, in particular, consultation, planning, technical estimates; providing technical expert opinion; renting of data processing programs; materials testing; testing of technical products and methods; laboratory testing services; all of the above services are provided for others | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Witzenmann GmbH Metallschlauch-Fabrik Pforzheim
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HYDRAFLEX
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 30, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |