USPTO serial 74116928
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CABS-Computer Automated Business Systems PTY. LTD.
Sydney, New South Wales 2000, AU
Other trademarks owned by CABS-Computer Automated Business Systems PTY. LTD.
CABS-Computer Automated Business Systems PTY. LTD.
Sydney, New South Wales 2000, AU
Other trademarks owned by CABS-Computer Automated Business Systems PTY. LTD.
CABS-Computer Automated Business Systems PTY. LTD.
Sydney, New South Wales 2000, AU
Other trademarks owned by CABS-Computer Automated Business Systems PTY. LTD.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LINDA L. BERKOWITZ
LINDA L BERKOWITZ LADAS & PARRY26 W 61ST STNEW YORK, NY 10023-7604UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software, and computer software and manuals sold together, for use in managing law and accounting offices | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 1989 |
| 042 | consultancy services in the field of computer software for the professional services industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 1989 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 28, 1995 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 6, 1994 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 10, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 22, 1994 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 31, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 2, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 11, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 16, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 15, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 2, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 23, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |