USPTO serial 74125937
SYSTEMCOMMAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 16, 1994
- Examiner
- GREER, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SYSTEMCOMMAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rockville, MD
Rockville, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norm D. St. Landau
TUCKER, FLYER, SANGER & LEWIS NORM D ST LANDAU1615 L ST N WSTE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer utility program which monitors and corrects critical parameters of operating programs in real-time to maintain such programs and application availability | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 25, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 16, 1994 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 11, 1994 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 1994 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 17, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1992 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 21, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 25, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |