USPTO serial 74127148
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Safetell Security Screens Limited
Dartford, Kent DA1 1NX, GB
Safetell Security Screens Limited
Dartford, Kent DA1 1NX, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Osborne, Jr.
JOHN S OSBORNE JR WATSON, FARLEY & WILLIAMS380 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal partitions, metal window shutters, metal rolling window shutters, metal door panels, metal ceiling panels, metal screens, metal doors, metal door frames, metal locks and keys therefor and parts for the aforementioned goods all having security, anti-theft or bullet proof capabilities | ABANDONED | — |
| 019 | non-metal exterior building shutters, non-metal exterior roll shutters, non-metal window shutters, glass panels, non-metal door panels, non-metal ceiling panels, wall panels, non-metal doors, non-metal door frames, non-metal window frames, non-metal window casements, window glass, window panes, non-metal window sills and parts therefor, all the foregoing having security, anti-theft or bullet proof capabilities | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 25, 1995 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 1995 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Aug 10, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 31, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 11, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 23, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1991 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 1991 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 1991 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |