USPTO serial 74149421
DURA-BACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O LEAR, JANICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DURA-BACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Cornman
MICHAEL A CORNMAN SCHWEITZER, CORNMAN & GROSS230 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10169UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | latex backings for rugs | ABANDONED | May 31, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1991 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 23, 1991 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 12, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |