USPTO serial 74153136
KITCHEN COLLECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KITCHEN COLLECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | paper tissue products; namely, napkins and towels | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 25, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 29, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 18, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 7, 1994 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Jun 14, 1993 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 17, 1992 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 25, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |