USPTO serial 74162129
SMART TANK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACK, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMART TANK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Albert L. Gabriel
ALBERT L GABRIEL ESQ514 VIA DE LA VALLE, STE 310SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | automatic electronic crankcase oil level sensors, level regulators, and continuos oil changing units | ABANDONED | Dec 27, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 9, 1994 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 9, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 9, 1994 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 13, 1993 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1992 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 1992 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 5, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 20, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |