USPTO serial 74165207
CANDYLAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CANDYLAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William B. Cunningham, Jr.
WILLIAM B CUNNINGHAM JR POLSTER, POLSTER AND LUCCHESISTE 160763 S NEW BALLAS RDST LOUIS, MO 63141Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | retail candy stores offering self-service, bulk sales of candy | ABANDONED | Aug 1, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 24, 1994 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 24, 1994 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 26, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 16, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 11, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 28, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 19, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |