USPTO serial 74165337
CACHET INTIMATES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CACHET INTIMATES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARTHUR J. DEBAUGH
JACK B HICKS RHODES COATS & BENNETT, LLPPOST OFFICE BOX 2974GREENSBORO, NC 27402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | intimate apparel; namely, underwear and lingerie and foundation garments | ABANDONED | Oct 19, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 1998 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 1, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 1998 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 24, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 30, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 14, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |