USPTO serial 74168658
ORIMULSION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 12, 1994
- Examiner
- BATTLE, KENNETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ORIMULSION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Urb. Las Mercedes, Caracas, VE
Urb. Las Mercedes, Caracas, VE
Urb. Las Mercedes, Caracas, VE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Myles J. Tralins
MYLES J TRALINS TRALINS AND ASSOCIATESONE BISCAYNE TWR STE 33102 S BISCAYNE BLVDMIAMI, FL 33131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | bitumen-in-water emulsion for use in the manufacture of liquid fuel | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 1989 |
| 004 | liquid base load fuel for the energy sector | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 1989 |
| 035 | computerized database management for the energy sector; conducting marketing studies in the energy sector | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 1989 |
| 039 | storage of a liquid base load fuel for others in the energy sector; transporation by shipping for the energy sector | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 1989 |
| 042 | technical consultation and research in the energy sector; and computer services; namely, leasing access time to computer databases in the energy sector | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BITUMENES, ORINOCO, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by BITUMENES, ORINOCO, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by BITUMENES, ORINOCO, S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ORIMULSION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 12, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 18, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 30, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 1993 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 21, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |