USPTO serial 74168663
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Urb. Las Mercedes, Caracas, VE
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | bitumen-in-water emulsion for use in the manufacture of liqued fuel | ABANDONED | — |
| 004 | liquid base load fuel for the energy sector | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | power and industrial energy sectors | ABANDONED | — |
| 019 | power and industrial energy sectors | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | computerized database management for the energy sector, conducting marketing studies in the energy sector | ABANDONED | — |
| 039 | storage of a liqued base load fuel for others in the energy sector, transportation by shipping for the energy sector | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | technical consultation and research in the energy sector, and computer services, namely, leasing access time to computer databases in the energy sector | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 4, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |