USPTO serial 74168758
JAMES BOND JR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JAMES BOND JR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
1001 Lausanne, CH
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE REZAC & SCHWAB708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-4141UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services; namely, television and motion picture film production | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 24, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 24, 1995 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 22, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 24, 1994 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 3, 1994 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 1994 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 24, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 1994 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1993 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1993 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Jul 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 20, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |