USPTO serial 74169689
BRINGING QUALITY TO LIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1899416Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 13, 1995
- Examiner
- MOORHEAD CORA ANN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BRINGING QUALITY TO LIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kanata, Ontario K2K 1Y3, CA
Kanata, Ontario K2K 1Y3, CA
Kanata, Ontario K2K 1Y3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL T. MURPHY
MICHAEL T MURPHY ROYLANCE, ABRAMS BERDO & GOODMAN1225 CONNECTICUT AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036-2680UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | excimer lasers and laser beam delivery hardware; carbon dioxide laser units, solid state and excimer [ dyed ] * AND DYE * laser units, computer assisted controls for laser output and parts therefor; laser apparatus for producing permanent marks on small or difficult to mark products | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | medical excimer lasers and laser beam delivery hardware; medical carbon dioxide laser units, medical solid state and medical excimer [ dyed ] * AND DYE * laser units, medical computer assisted controls for laser output and parts therefor | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LUMONICS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LUMONICS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LUMONICS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named BRINGING QUALITY TO LIGHT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2002 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 5, 1996 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 31, 1996 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 30, 1996 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| May 15, 1996 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Dec 13, 1995 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 31, 1995 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 31, 1995 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 19, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 26, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 1994 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 27, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 4, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 12, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |