USPTO serial 74170706
INFO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUNN, ELIZABETH A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INFO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Hughes
MICHAEL J HUGHES THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW OFFICE OFMICHAEL HUGHES1171 HOMESTEAD RD STE 295SANTA CLARA, CA 95050Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer data input and signal transmission devices; namely, hand held graphics scanners, computer mouse products, automatic peripheral switching devices, intelligent printer buffers; interface converters; data switches; line extenders and couplers, and computer programs for use in optical character recognition, software, mouse and scanner; and softwarefor producing and multicolor drawing and presentation | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 1994 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 20, 1993 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jun 4, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 14, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |