USPTO serial 74180285
THE ELEGANT HIGH PERFORMANCE SHOWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 9, 1993
- Examiner
- HINES, CARYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE ELEGANT HIGH PERFORMANCE SHOWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
City of Industry, CA
City of Industry, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. Robinson
WILLIAM J ROBINSON GRAHAM & JAMES14TH FL801 S FIGUEROA STLOS ANGELES, CA 90017-5554Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | bathroom and shower fixtures; namely, faucets and shower heads | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 3, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 1999 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 9, 1993 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 30, 1992 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 30, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 24, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 26, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |