USPTO serial 74180870
MONTEIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEEGARS, GERALD C.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MONTEIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ludwigshafen D-67059, DE
Ludwigshafen D-67059, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert C. Ross
HERBERT C ROSS OPPENHEIMER WOLFF & DONNELLYONE CITICORP CTR153 E 53RD STNEW YORK, NY 10022Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfume; toilette water; soaps; namely, saddle soaps, deodorant soaps, and skin soaps; bath- and shower additives; namely, bath gel, bath oil, and shower gel; sun protection and sun care; namely, non-medicated sun screen preparations and sun block preparations; antiperspirant; deodorants for personal use; creams; namely, body, hand and eye cream; powder; namely, face powder and body powder; rouge; eyebrow-pencil; eyeshadow; mascara; lipstick; lotions; namely, face lotions, hand lotions, body lotions and hair waving lotions; face scrubs and facial moisturizing mask; articles for hair care; namely, hair shampoo, hair conditioner and hair spray; depilatory cream; shaving creme, shaving gel; aftershave lotion and aftershave cologne; skin cleansing cream; nail enamel; nail enamel remover | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 11, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 13, 1994 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |