USPTO serial 74185342
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine M. Basile
Katherine M. Basile Reed Smith LLPP.O. Box 488Intellectual PropertyPittsburgh, PA 15230-0488| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer program which serves to facilitate communications between differing operating systems by providing a standard language | ABANDONED | Jul 10, 1992 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 1995 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jul 7, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 30, 1993 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 27, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 2, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 22, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 23, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 25, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |