USPTO serial 74192222
THE ROMULANS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE ROMULANS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Pleasant Hill, CA
Pleasant Hill, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | parlor games; namely, connect the dots game sets | ABANDONED | Feb 1, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 10, 1995 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 9, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |