USPTO serial 74192408
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Toronto, Ontario M4T 2S7, CA
Toronto, Ontario M4T 2S7, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carol L.B. Matthews
CAROL L B MATTHEWS MASON, FENWICK & LAWRENCE1225 EYE ST NW STE 1000WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | laundry products; namely, detergents, soaps, bleaching preparations, dryer sheets, fabric softeners for domestic use and stain removers; hair care products; namely, shampoos, conditioners, hair sprays, styling gels and mousses, hair dyes and rinses; skin creams; petroleum jelly for cosmetic uses; bath soaps; personal deodorants; mouth wash; breath fresheners and toothpaste | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | baby foods; sanitary panties for infants; analgesics; disinfectants for general use; antibiotic creams and lotions; cough syrup; vitamin and mineral supplements; and household, air, car, and room deodorants | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | feeding bottles and pacifiers for infants | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | paper products; namely, disposable diapers, toilet paper, tissues, towels and napkins | ABANDONED | — |
| 029 | processed meats, fish and poultry; processed fruits and vegetables; processed edible seeds; jellies and jams; edible oils and fats; salad dressings; fruit preserves; and pickled vegetables | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, and rice; flour, and breakfast and processed cereals; bread, cookies, crackers, pastry, and candy; honey and table syrups; processed grains; yeasts and baking powder; condiments; namely, mustards, catsup and relish; salt; vinegar; sauces; namely, salsa, barbecue sauce, seafood sauce, and steak sauce; and processed herbs and spices | ABANDONED | — |
| 031 | unprocessed grains for eating; bird, flower, and vegetable seeds; cat food and dog food | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | mineral waters; fruit drinks and fruit juices; and soft drinks | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 13, 1993 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 23, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 21, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 19, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |