USPTO serial 74194707
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Oak Brook, IL
Oak Brook, IL
San Francisco, CA
BURLINGAME, CA
Oak Brook, IL
Oak Brook, IL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANTONIO R. SARABIA II
BETH M GOLDMAN HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & MCAULIFFE LLP333 BUSH STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-2878UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services; namely, providing a theme amusement facility featuring the sale of food and drink | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 20, 1991 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2006 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 5, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 15, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 30, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 1991 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 20, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 1991 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 27, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |