Drawing for HI MIQ

USPTO serial 74194893

HI MIQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HI MIQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katherine L. McDaniel

KATHERINE L MCDANIEL ALSCHULER, GROSSMAN & PINES2049 CENTURY PARK E 39TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007equipment, machinery and apparatus with computer logic capability; namely, clothes washing machines and dishwashersABANDONED
009equipment, machinery and apparatus with computer logic capability; namely, 35mm, motion picture, photographic and video cameras; photographic, movie and slide projectors; 35mm, motion picture, photographic and video print processing equipment; video cassette recorders; television sets; radios; vacuum cleaners; computer chips; computer hardware; computer memories; computer operating systems; signal processors; computer operating programs; anti-instrusion alarms and fire alarms; medical emergency alarms; photograph and slide enlargers; vehicular traffic signal control apparatus; vehicular collision avoidance apparatus; language translators; and pocket language translatorsABANDONED
010medical apparatus with computer logic capability; namely, ultrasonic diagnostic apparatusABANDONED
011equipment, machinery and apparatus with computer logic capability; namely, rice cookers; air conditioners; refrigerators; clothes dryers; electric fans; electric fans; electric heaters; microwave ovens for cooking; portable electric heaters; hot water heaters; and kerosene heatersABANDONED
012equipment, machinery and apparatus with computer logic capability; namely, automobiles; vehicular anti-theft alarms; land motor vehicle transmissions; vehicle mufflers; brakes for land vehicles; and suspension systems for vehiclesABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 1996ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 8, 1996EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Dec 12, 1995EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Aug 10, 1995EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 19, 1995EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Feb 8, 1995EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 3, 1995EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 5, 1994NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 12, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 11, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 14, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 12, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 30, 1993NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED
Jul 7, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 1993CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
May 27, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 29, 1993CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Sep 23, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 29, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 30, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance