USPTO serial 74195787
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James L. Kurtz
JAMES L KURTZ KINZER, PLYER, DORN, MCEACHRAN & JAMBORSTE 390555 E MONROE STCHICAGO, IL 60603| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | promoting the goods and services of others through the dissemination of promotional materials | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 9, 1993 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 4, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 14, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1991 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |