Drawing for SODAS

USPTO serial 74200625

SODAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SODAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas P. Sarro

THOMAS P SARRO LARSON AND TAYLOR727 TWENTY-THIRD ST SARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041educational services; namely, offering and conducting courses of instruction in the field of problem solvingABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 31, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Nov 17, 1996ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 16, 1996EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Nov 16, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Nov 2, 1995JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 30, 1995JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 24, 1995EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
May 16, 1994CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Apr 14, 1994JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Apr 14, 1994EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 25, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 24, 1993CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Oct 1, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 2, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 29, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 1, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Mar 29, 1993CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED
Mar 18, 1993SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Feb 3, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 3, 1993IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Aug 4, 1992NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 12, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 10, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 7, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 9, 1991CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Nov 12, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance