USPTO serial 74202704
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Los Angeles, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel M. Cislo
DANIEL M CISLO CISLO & THOMAS LLP233 WILSHIRE BLVDSTE 900SANTA MONICA, CA 90401-1211| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | casual shoes, running shoes, basketball shoes, tennis shoes, cross training shoes, aerobics shoes, hiking shoes, and volleyball shoes, all footwear specifically excluding shoes and footwear designed for horseback riding and all to be sold through stores specializing in shoes and footwear and at swap meets | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 30, 1991 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 28, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 29, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 2, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 2, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |