USPTO serial 74207508
FLIPPA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLIPPA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North York Ontario M2K 2K1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George A. Rolston
GEORGE A ROLSTON43 EGLINTON AVE E STE 706TORONTO, ON M4P 1A2CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | novelty item in nature of a cotton circular disk with a spring wire border for use in advertising and graphics applications | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 26, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 1991 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |