USPTO serial 74208881
ULTRA BRITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, JEFFREY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ULTRA BRITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontairo, CA
ULTRA BRITE INTERNATIONAL INC.
Mississauga, Ontario L5B 3C2, CA
ULTRA BRITE INTERNATIONAL INC.
Mississauga, Ontario L5B 3C2, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill W. Bradbury
JENIFER PAINE PAUL HASTINGS JANOFSKY & WALKER, LLP399 PARK AVE 31ST FLNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | laundry detergent | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CHEMAR CORPORATION INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ULTRA BRITE INTERNATIONAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ULTRA BRITE INTERNATIONAL INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named ULTRA BRITE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 1999 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 22, 1993 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 1993 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 15, 1993 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 15, 1993 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |