USPTO serial 74209863
NEOCARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUTHEY, LYNN A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEOCARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JANICE A. SHARP
JANICE A SHARP CHRISTIE, PARKER AND HALESTE 500350 W COLORADO BLVDPASADENA, CA 91109-7068Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin care products; namely, body lotion, skin soap, toner, face creams and gels; hair care products; namely, shampoos and conditioners, non-medicated scalp treatments; sunscreen preparations; all purpose cleaning preparations; degreasers for use on ovens, countertops, vinyl, floors, walls, and sinks | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | odor neutralizing preparations for use on tobacco smoke, food by-products, pets and pet excrement, vomit, perspiration, decomposing materials, and urine; all purpose disinfectants; nutritional and vitamin supplements | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 1995 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 3, 1995 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 22, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 9, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |