Drawing for INTELLIVISION

USPTO serial 74210243

INTELLIVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SZOKE, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTELLIVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce E. Hayden

BRUCE E HAYDEN29330 LOWER MOSS ROCK RDGOLDEN, CO 80401UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electrical apparatus; namely, multimedia computersABANDONED
035advertising and business; namely, creating and preparing interactive multimedia advertisements and business presentations for othersABANDONED
042designing interactive multimedia presentations for educational use and consultation services rendered in connection therewithABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 1993LEXTLATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST
Oct 1, 1993ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 1993NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 5, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 4, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 6, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 5, 1992CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Oct 13, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 31, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 13, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 17, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance