USPTO serial 74213577
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MICROSYSTEM CONTROLS PTY. LTD.
Jamisontown, New South Wales, AU
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | coin and token validation systems; coin and token sorting apparatus; coin and token discrimination apparatus; coin and token validation apparatus; mechamisms for oin-freed apparatus; counterfeit coin detectors; money counting and sorting machines; electrical and electronic apparatus for field programming of coin and token validators; parts of and accessories for aforementioned goods | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |