USPTO serial 74216164
CRYSTALLINE SHINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1914050Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 22, 1995
- Examiner
- MANI, LALITHA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CRYSTALLINE SHINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Paoli, PA
Paoli, PA
Paoli, PA
Paoli, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Kelly
LISA PELLER FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT1300 I ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | haircare products; namely, hair sealer and enhancer to improve overall appearance and texture sold in a kit by way of television advertising | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 6, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN TELECAST CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by LORI DAVIS HAIR, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LORI DAVIS HAIR, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN TELECAST CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named CRYSTALLINE SHINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2003 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 2003 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 20, 2002 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 3, 1997 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 22, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 6, 1995 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 6, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 25, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 9, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 8, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 25, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 8, 1993 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 12, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 28, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |